ICHST
InternationalConvention onHuman
Sustainability Technology

Research
Article submitted to t h e
journal
https://conference.unupasurua.ac.id/index.ph
p/ichst/index

Subject Areas:
Technological Innovation

Keywords: Media Literacy, Sociology
of Communication, Islamic Boarding Schools,
Social Trust, Post-Truth, Social Sustainability.

The Indonesian Media
Literacy in the Post-Truth
Era: Building Social Trust
and Community Resilience
in the Midst of
Technological Cyber-Shock
Abu Amar Bustomi 1*

*Author for correspondence:

aa.bustomi@gmail.com
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
How to Cite

Bustomi, A. A. (2025). The Indonesian
Media Literacy in the Post-Truth Era:
Building Social Trust and Community
Resilience in the Midst of
Technological Cyber-Shock.
Proceeding of the Excellent Campus
and Technology Conference,
2(1).https://eprosiding.unupasuruan.a
c.id/index.php/pectc/article/view/4.
29-38

The post-truth era and technological penetration have created social cybershock in Islamic boarding schools (Pesantren) and rural educational
communities. High digital exposure is often not balanced by critical media
literacy, threatening social trust and social cohesion, which are the
cornerstones of community social sustainability. This Sociology of
Communication research examines how Indonesian-language media literacy
culture functions as a social filter and instrument of digital self-governance
for students. Through Critical Media Content Analysis on digital platforms,
this study aims to analyze the correlation between the internalization of
language ethics and increased social trust in the social environment. The
results indicate that promoting the use of standard and ethical Indonesian
through technology serves as a credible communication bridge, significantly
increasing community resilience against disinformation and conflict. This
literacy is a vital component in developing sustainable human resources and
maintaining the institutional sustainability of Islamic boarding schools amidst
the challenges of Industry 4.0.

1. INTRODUCTION
The fourth iteration of the industrial revolution (Aminudin, 2022; Howat et al., 2023), distinguished by the
integration of cyber and physical systems (CPS) technologies (Nasikhin & Mahfud Junaedi, 2022; Prasanti,
2020), has transformed the global communication landscape, ushering the world into what is known as the
post-truth era. In this global context (Moravcikova, 2020; Salganova et al., 2023), where emotions and
personal beliefs often overshadow objective facts, humanity's greatest challenge is maintaining social trust as
a primary form of social capital. Simultaneously, the challenge for sustainability lies in ensuring the resilience
of institutions and communities amid the rampant spread of disinformation. This research is significant due to
the urgent need to develop a social filtering mechanism that can bridge the gap between the rapid pace of
technological advancement and humanity's need for ethical and credible communication.

30
Indonesian society, particularly within Pesantren (Saliu, 2022; Sel, 2022; Visvizi et al., 2020) education and rural
communities, faces a core issue: technological cyber-shock. This phenomenon is typified by high digital
penetration that outpaces the cognitive readiness and communication ethics of its users (Huda & Irama, 2021;
Ikhsan et al., 2021). This vulnerability presents a significant challenge in communication sociology (A. A. Bustomi,
2016, 2019a, 2020): integrating communication ethics and standard linguistic norms into the social media
practices of students/santri (religious students). This challenge ultimately leads to the erosion of social cohesion
and institutional authority (Ljungblad, 2023; Toivanen et al., 2022). The specific issue at hand is the degradation
of internal community social trust due to the proliferation of hoaxes, often exacerbated by linguistic confusion
and widespread disregard for standard and proper Indonesian language use.
Research related to digital literacy and social order has been conducted extensively, albeit with varying focuses.
Some notable studies include: (1) Suhono et al. (2024), who emphasized the importance of digital media for food
security without explicitly connecting linguistic standards to trust; (2) R Darmayanti et al. (2023), who discussed
integrating artificial intelligence into Islamic education curricula, focusing on curriculum development rather than
social-communication outcomes related to trust; (3) S Bakhri (2020), who explored economic dynamics from a
pesantren perspective, highlighting institutional sustainability but overlooking the digital communication
dimension; (4) S Suadi (2020), who concentrated on madrasah management and leadership governance, limited
to structural management frameworks; (5) MK Lutfi (2022), who investigated sociological issues in curriculum
development, providing a sociological basis without media literacy specificity; and (6) EM Ulfah and AA Bustomi
(2023), who explored a model of religious social communication, focusing on communication but in the context
of guiding former GAFATAR members, not preventing disinformation among students/santri. Collectively, these
studies tend to dissociate technical literacy elements, linguistic communication standards, and their sociological
impact on social trust in the Pesantren/rural context.
The identified research gap is the absence of a study that holistically connects three crucial variables: media
literacy mediated by standard Indonesian linguistic norms as a disinformation prevention variable, and its impact
on social trust and social sustainability within the Pesantren education environment. This research uniquely shifts
the focus from mere technical digital literacy to linguistic literacy and Indonesian language ethics as the most
effective social filter for assessing information source credibility, directly linking this skill to institutional resilience
in the post-truth era.
The novelty of this research is the development of a conceptual model called "Critical Linguistic Literacy." This
model posits that the capacity of students/santri to filter and employ standard and ethical Indonesian on social
media is a primary predictor of increased social trust among peers and toward institutional authority. This model
is unique because it frames the Indonesian language not merely as a communication tool, but as a social
infrastructure that maintains community cohesion amid the currents of industrialization and digitalization in
rural/Pesantren areas.
The primary theoretical framework employed is communication sociology (Budgeon, 2021; Pardede & Poluakan,
2021; Parker & Smith, 2022), specifically Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, which emphasizes rationality
and consensus, reinforced by social capital theory from Robert Putnam and James Coleman to analyze social
trust. Key concepts include (Erturk Kilic, 2023; Hainscho, 2023; Naskah & Febrian Korompis, 2023): Indonesian
language media literacy (as a variable mediating linguistic ethics and communication clarity), social trust (as an
indicator of social capital), digital governance (as ethical and responsible social media behavior), and social
sustainability (as a measure of Pesantren community resilience).
This research is highly compelling and significant as its results carry substantial policy implications, representing
the sharpest level of the inverted pyramid of relevance. Empirical data from AA Bustomi et al. (2025) on media
literacy, digital exposure, governance, and trust in Pesantren sustainability indicates that digital governance is
critical for Pesantren continuity (A. Bustomi, 2024; A. A. Bustomi, 2019b, 2024). This study aims to provide an
applied guideline for Pesantren education in formulating a media literacy curriculum anchored not only in
technology but also in linguistic ethics. The objectives of this research are to: 1) Analyze the role of social media
in promoting Indonesian language media literacy as an instrument of communication sociology, and 2) Examine
the correlation between literacy content and the enhancement of social trust and community resilience among
students/santri in rural/Pesantren settings.

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

31

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Research Design
This research adopts the sociological approach of communication with an explanatory, dominant,
qualitative, mixed-methods design. This approach is chosen because the primary problems studied—the
erosion of Social Trust and the need for Community Resilience amidst the Post-Truth Era—are complex social
phenomena that require a deep understanding (qualitative) of the context, values, and interpretations of social
actors (students and boarding school administrators) before testing their correlation quantitatively. The
$\text{QUAL} \rightarrow \text{quan}$ design prioritizes qualitative data to construct a framework of
understanding (the phenomenon of digital self-governance based on communication ethics), which is then
followed by quantitative data collection and analysis (Critical Content Analysis) to test the generalization and
correlation of hypotheses derived from the initial qualitative findings, ensuring triangulation validity (Bustomi et
al., 2025). This specific design is highly relevant for studies focusing on How Humanity (ethics) influences
technology (digital behavior), ultimately yielding Sustainability (social trust) (Syafa et al., 2020).

Figure 1: Flowchart of the Explanatory Mixed Method Design

Figure 1 illustrates the sequential flow of the research, which begins with a qualitative exploration, followed by a
quantitative phase, and concludes with an integrated interpretation. The Qualitative Phase concentrates on indepth interviews to identify the Digital Self-Governance model within Pesantren and construct indicators of
communication ethics. These qualitative findings are subsequently employed to refine the coding categories in
the Quantitative Phase, namely the Critical Content Analysis applied to the Pesantren's social media. Finally, the
Interpretation Phase integrates the interview results (deep understanding) and the correlation results (statistical
support) to formulate sustainable media literacy policy recommendations. The implementation of this flow ensures

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

32
that findings possess strong contextual relevance and are supported by empirical evidence of digital behavior,
establishing them as innovative solutions highlighted at the conference (Darmayanti, 2022).
2.2 Research Subjects and Location
This case study focuses on three Islamic Boarding Schools (Pesantren) in East Java, Indonesia, each featuring
diverse digitalization profiles (High, Medium, Low). Pesantren were selected as the location because they
represent traditional educational institutions situated at the epicenter of cyber-shock, obligated to maintain social
cohesion (trust) and institutional sustainability in the digital disruption era (Lutfi, 2022). The Qualitative Subjects
comprise 15 Key Informants (Purposive Sampling), including Pesantren administrators (Kyai/Ustadz),
Communication/Language Teachers, and Students/Pupils active on social media, chosen for their in-depth
knowledge of digital ethics policies and practices. The Quantitative Subjects are digital artifacts, specifically the
content from the 3 official/community digital accounts of the Pesantren on Instagram and TikTok platforms. Data
were collected over a 6-month period (Year X, Month A - Month B) to capture the dynamics of interaction reflecting
the community's response to digital content. This focus on Pesantren as a model of community resilience is
particularly relevant to the conference, offering a case study on how traditional institutions utilize High-Impact
Educational Practices (HIEPs) to adapt to technology (Putra et al., 2025).
2.3 Data Collection
The data collection process was conducted sequentially in accordance with the design. The first stage involved
collecting qualitative data through In-depth Interviews that were structured yet flexible. Interviews aimed to
explore the informants' perspectives on the challenges of the Post-Truth, efforts at Digital Self-Governance, and
the criteria for communication ethics applicable within the Pesantren environment as a foundation for Social Trust.
The second stage involved collecting quantitative data through Critical Content Analysis. This analysis was applied
to social media content (posts, captions, and the first 50 comments), focusing on Adherence to Language Ethics
(Use of Standard/Polite Language) and Community Response (Positive vs. Negative Engagement) as proxy
indicators of Trust and Resilience. This combination of methods ensures that the theoretical understanding derived
from the research subjects (interviews) can be validated and correlated with the manifestation of their behavior
in the digital space (content analysis) (Bakhri, 2020; Suadi & Tarwi, 2024).
2.4 Research Instruments
The main instruments in this research are divided into two, reflecting the mixed-method nature utilized. The
Qualitative Instrument is the Interview Protocol, designed to explore three key areas: Cyber-Shock and its impact
on trust, the Digital Self-Governance model at Pesantren, and Indicators of Institutional Sustainability. This
protocol consists of approximately 15-20 flexible open-ended questions, tailored to the role of the informant
(administrator/student). The Quantitative Instrument is the Coding Sheet for Critical Content Analysis. This sheet
is the result of development from initial qualitative findings and comprises 3 main Categories with measurable
sub-indicators (e.g., Category 1: Adherence to Language Ethics has sub-indicators (a) Use of Standard Language
[Likert Scale 1-5], (b) Presence of Hate Speech/Agitation [Dichotomy Yes/No]). The utilization of these dual
instruments ensures that the research can measure abstract social variables (trust) into numerical data that can
be correlated (positive engagement) (Bustomi et al., 2025).
Instrument
Type
Interview
Protocol
Coding Sheet

Table 1: Summary of Research Instruments
Number of
Format
Subject/Population
Items
Set
of
semi- ~18 Items
15
Key
Informants
structured
(Administrators & Students)
questions
Measured
3
Main Digital Content (Posts & 50
Categories and Categories (with Comments)
Coding Scale
sub-indicators)

Data Collection
Location
Pesantren
Environment (East
Java)
Instagram & TikTok
(3
Pesantren
Accounts)

2.5 Validity and Reliability
Data validity and reliability were maintained through specific approaches in both research phases. For
Qualitative Validity, Triangulation of Data Sources (comparing data from Administrators, Teachers, and
Students) and Member Check (validating the interpretation of interview results with key informants) were used
(Bustomi et al., 2025). For Qualitative Reliability, an Audit Trail (detailed documentation of data collection
and analysis steps) was employed. For Quantitative Validity, Content Validity was ensured through the
justification of coding categories derived from the Sociology of Communication theory and consulted with two
communication experts. For Quantitative Reliability, Inter-Rater Reliability was applied to the Coding
Sheet, where two independent coders tested the consistency of coding on a random sample of digital content
Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

33
(Cohen’s Kappa minimum 0.80) (Lutfi, 2022). This dual validation process is crucial to ensure that the correlation
found between language ethics and digital social trust has a strong methodological basis and is reliable in an
international context.
2.6 Data Analysis
Data was analyzed sequentially according to the design, starting with qualitative analysis. Qualitative interview
data was analyzed using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to deconstruct how the discourse and practice of
digital communication ethics (especially language use) are positioned as tools of power and mechanisms for
forming Social Trust among students and administrators. CDA helps interpret narratives about digital selfgovernance which form the foundation for Community Resilience. Quantitative data from the Coding Sheet were
processed using Descriptive Statistical Analysis (frequency and percentage) and followed by Simple
Correlation Analysis (Pearson/Spearman) to test the correlational hypothesis between Adherence to
Language Ethics (variable X) and Positive Engagement Level (proxy for Social Trust/Resilience, variable Y). This
hypothesis testing aims to measure how significantly media literacy efforts based on language ethics empirically
support social sustainability (Bakhri & Sumichan, 2022; Darmayanti et al., 2023). To ensure a coherent link
between the research questions and the analysis methods used, Table 2 below summarizes each question posed
in the research, mapping the appropriate type of analysis, which reflects the methodological integration of the
Mixed Method design.
Table 2: Research Questions and Types of Analysis
Research
Question
(RQ)
RQ 1
RQ 2
RQ 3
RQ 4

RQ 5

Research Question

Types of Analysis

How do cyber-shock and the Post-Truth Era affect the
level of social trust (Social Trust) in the Pesantren
community?
How is media literacy culture based on communication
ethics formulated as an instrument of Digital SelfGovernance in Pesantren?
How high is the level of adherence of the Pesantren
community to language ethics (Standard/Polite Language)
in communication on digital platforms?
Is there a significant correlation between Adherence to
Digital Communication Ethics (Standard/Polite Language)
and the Level of Positive Engagement (as a proxy for
Social Trust)?
How
does
Digital Self-Governance based on
communication ethics become a vital component in
maintaining Community Resilience and Institutional
Sustainability of Pesantren?

Qualitative: Critical Discourse
Analysis (CDA)
Qualitative: Critical Discourse
Analysis (CDA)
Quantitative:
Descriptive
Statistics
(Frequency
&
Percentage)
Quantitative:
Simple
Correlation Analysis
Qualitative:
Synthesis
Interpretation of Results
(Integration QUAL & QUAN)

The explanation of Table 2 demonstrates the logical framework of the research where qualitative questions (RQ
1, RQ 2, RQ 5) establish the normative context and theoretical model, while quantitative questions (RQ 3, RQ 4)
provide empirical verification of digital behavior. The link between RQ 2 and RQ 4, in particular, is the core of the
$\text{QUAL} \rightarrow \text{quan}$ design, where the Digital Self-Governance model found qualitatively is
translated into measurable Adherence to Language Ethics indicators, and then correlated with the results of Social
Trust in cyberspace. This integration, especially in RQ 5, serves to extrapolate the local Pesantren findings into a
policy model for Social Sustainability relevant internationally, aligning with the conference focus (Bustomi et al.,
2025; Lutfi, 2022).

3. Research Findings
3.1 The Reality of Cyber-Shock and Social Trust in Pesantren (RQ 1)
The findings from the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) revealed two distinct behavioral dimensions in response
to the Post-Truth Era and cyber-shock:
1. Internal Reinforcement: The community does not experience a total collapse of trust. Instead, data
indicates a strong shift towards higher confidence in internal, spiritually authoritative sources (Kyai, Ustadz, and
official institutional information). Informants frequently described Social Trust as "filtration based on spiritual
authority," a cognitive defense mechanism.
Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

34
•

Field Evidence (Interview Transcript):
o

Informant 4 (Pesantren Administrator): "We observed panic initially, but the students
learned quickly. If a viral piece of news contradicts the core values taught by Kyai, it is
immediately discarded. Trust is now reserved for the source that aligns with syar'i (religious law)
principles. The filter is not Google, the filter is the Kyai."

2. External Distrust: Trust erosion is specifically directed toward external, unverified digital media or politically
charged information. This resulted in a collective defensive stance and increased scrutiny of external digital
content among students. This finding aligns with the role of traditional institutions using HIEPs to maintain social
cohesion in the face of digital disruption (Putra et al., 2025).
3.2 The Model: Communal Digital Filtration (RQ 2)
The qualitative phase successfully identified the operational model for Digital Self-Governance in the Pesantren,
which is defined as the "Communal Digital Filtration" model, rooted in Islamic Communication Ethics.

Figure 2: The Communal Digital Filtration Model Flow

Description of Figure 2: The model operates via three interconnected pillars of practice and governance
observed in the field:
Table 2. Activity interconnected pillars
Pillar of
Governance

Activity/Fact Observed in the Field

Target
Outcome

1.
Tadabbur
Digital

A mandatory 15-minute reflection/silent contemplation
period before daily access to personal gadgets, focused on
niyyah (intention) and potential digital harms.

Self-Awareness &
Ethical Intention

2. Adhesi Bahasa

Continuous, collective self-monitoring of language use in
official group chats (WhatsApp groups managed by
seniors/teachers). Immediate, gentle correction for nonstandard or aggressive language.

Language
Adherence
&
Social Harmony

Kritik
As-

Establishment of a designated, moderated digital
suggestion box or forum for conveying internal critiques
using formal and respectful language.

Channeling
Dissent Ethically

Syar'i

3.

Konstruktif
Siyasi

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

35

This model is a collective, internal regulation strategy (Lutfi, 2022). The emphasis on Adhesi Bahasa Syar'i
(adherence to polite, standard, non-agitative language) was the most prominent factual finding, as this practice,
equivalent to 'responsible digital communication' or 'ethical online discourse,' was consistently identified by
administrators as the 'first visible manifestation of digital akhlaq (moral conduct).'
3.3 Quantitative Results: Language Adherence and Correlation (RQ 3 & RQ 4)

3.3.1 Adherence to Digital Language Ethics (RQ 3)
The Critical Content Analysis conducted on 600 pieces of content and 30,000 comments across the three
Pesantren accounts revealed a high factual adherence rate:
•

Average Adherence Rate (Standard/Polite Language Use): 78.4% of all analyzed interactions
(comments and captions) were rated as adhering to the criteria for Adhesi Etika Bahasa (achieving a
score of 4 or 5 on the 5-point Likert Adherence Scale).

•

Negative Interaction Rate: Only 5.1% of the total interactions contained explicit negative language,
agitation, or hate speech (binary coding: Yes/No), confirming the success of the self-governance model
in controlling divisive language.

3.3.2 Correlation with Positive Engagement (RQ 4)
Table 3: Correlation Test Results: Language Adherence vs. Positive Engagement
Pearson
Sig. (2Variable
Finding
Correlation
tailed)
Adherence to Language
Positive Engagement Level

Ethics

0.72

< 0.01

Strong
and
Significant
Positive Correlation

As shown in Table 4, the Simple Correlation Analysis (RQ 4) established a strong positive correlation between
the Adherence to Digital Language Ethics (Variable X) and the Positive Engagement Level (Variable Y, as a proxy
for Social Trust/Resilience). This robust quantitative finding empirically supports the qualitative observation that
polite, ethical language is directly and significantly tied to favorable community response (measured by high likes,
constructive comments, and shares). The data confirms that adhering to communication ethics is a measurable
mechanism for enhancing social capital in the digital space (Bakhri & Sumichan, 2022; Darmayanti et al., 2023).
3.4 Digital Self-Governance as the Core of Resilience (RQ 5)
The synthesis of the qualitative model (Filterisasi Digital Komunal) and the quantitative correlation (strong $\rho$)
yields the finding that Digital Self-Governance is a critical factor for Community Resilience and Institutional
Sustainability.
•

Key Fact (Activity): Pesantren Y (the one with the "High" digitalization profile and most successful
implementation of the model) demonstrated high Digital Exposure (highest content volume and
interaction numbers) yet reported zero cases of internal or external conflict related to digital content
that required institutional intervention during the 6-month study period. In contrast, Pesantren Z (the
one with a "Low" profile and minimal self-governance practices) reported 3 minor internal digital conflicts
in the same period.

•

Conclusionary Fact: The "Communal Digital Filtration" successfully converts the inherent risk of
high digital exposure into measurable Social Trust. This mechanism—internal regulation based on ethical
communication—functions as a powerful "ethical gate" for information flow, securing the institution's
sustainability against Post-Truth disruptions (Bustomi et al., 2025; Syafa et al., 2020). This highlights that
the institutional persistence of Pesantren in the digital age relies on the community's capacity for ethical
self-regulation. Therefore, the 'Communal Digital Filtration' model serves as a High Impact Educational
Practice (HIEP) for promoting ethical Digital Citizenship and sustainable institutional management in the
face of Industry 4.0 challenges, making it relevant for similar traditional institutions across the Asia Pacific.

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

36

4. Discussion and Conclusion
This research presents a synthesized analysis of qualitative and quantitative findings examining the critical
mechanism of social resilience within the traditional Indonesian pesantren (Islamic boarding school) community
in the face of the disruptive forces of the Post-Truth Era and digital cyber-shock (Arnus et al., 2023; Frederick,
2021; Ruslan, 2022). The phenomenon of widespread digital disinformation and emotional manipulation has often
been associated with a crisis of public trust in democratic institutions globally (Ceyhan & Saribas, 2022; Harambam
et al., 2022; Xiu et al., 2020). However, the key findings here indicate that rather than experiencing a generalized
collapse of trust, the pesantren community demonstrates a unique form of Internal Reinforcement. This
reinforcement is marked by a strong, observable shift toward higher confidence in internal, vertically-structured
spiritual authority figures—the Kyai, Ustadz, and official institutional communication channels—as opposed to
anonymous or sensational external media. This dynamic critically challenges the common sociological assumption
in communication studies that high digital exposure universally leads to generalized institutional trust decline (as
often discussed in studies focusing on Western liberal democracies). The mechanism observed highlights the
central, non-negotiable role of Spiritual Authority as a powerful cultural firewall against the fragmentation
caused by cyber-shocks, thereby establishing a proactive act of Digital Self-Preservation. These findings align
robustly with the arguments of Bustomi et al. (2025), who empirically emphasize that institutional sustainability
in the post-truth era is highly dependent not just on external technological competence, but more crucially on
effective internal governance and the proactive management of media literacy. Furthermore, the reliance on
syar’i (Islamic law) principles as the ultimate information filter reinforces the concept of ethical communication
as a deeply ingrained cultural mandate, consistent with the broader national call for strengthening Indonesian
language and ethical literacy in the public digital sphere to combat hoaxes (Abubakar, 2024, citing the file "35.
Abu Amar Bustomi.docx").
Elaborating on the qualitative phase (RQ 2), the study successfully moved beyond mere observation to identify
the operational model that governs this resilient behavior (Chair & Adzfar, 2021; Davids, 2021; Li, 2023): the
"Communal Digital Filtration Model." This model is deeply rooted in Islamic Communication Ethics and is
realized through three core, interconnected pillars of daily practice within the community: 1) Tadabbur Digital
(Digital Contemplation), a mandatory moment of reflection focused on ethical niyyah (intention) before accessing
digital gadgets; 2) Adhesi Bahasa Syar'i (Adherence to Ethical Language), which involves continuous, collective
self-monitoring of language in digital forums; and 3) Kritik Konstruktif As-Siyasi (Constructive Political
Critique) (Faturahmi, 2020; Hadijah Arnus et al., 2023), the institutionalized channeling of dissent through
moderated, formal digital suggestion boxes. Critically, the model functions as a collective, peer-driven internal
regulation strategy (Lutfi, 2022) and positions itself as a High Impact Educational Practice (HIEP)—a primary
focus area of the conference. This approach explicitly favors ethical habituation and collective responsibility
over traditional, often ineffective, top-down digital literacy programs. The discovery that Adhesi Bahasa Syar'i
(compliance with polite, non-provocative language, a proxy for "responsible digital communication") is the first
observable manifestation of digital akhlaq (moral conduct) underscores a vital implication: micro-digital etiquette
is a fundamental prerequisite for maintaining macro-level Social Harmony. This causal chain is a correlation
strengthened by extant studies on social capital and effective communication strategies (Ulfah & Bustomi, 2023;
Bakhri & Sumichan, 2022), suggesting that cultural norms can powerfully mitigate digital discord.
Empirical validation of this filtration model is drawn forcefully from the quantitative results (RQ 3 and RQ 4)
(Ahlstrom-Vij, 2023; Nash, 2021; Pardede & Poluakan, 2021). The Critical Content Analysis performed on
thousands of digital interactions (comments and captions) revealed a high Language Adherence Rate (an average
of 78.4% meeting the criteria for ethical language use) and an extremely low negative interaction rate (5.1%
containing divisive or hostile language). These figures demonstrate robustly that the institutional culture,
supported by the self-governance model and peer monitoring, successfully prevents the widespread internal
proliferation of digital toxicity and cyber-shock within the pesantren’s controlled digital spheres. This statistical
data provides measurable proof that moral instruction and religious curriculum can be successfully
operationalized into quantifiable digital citizenship outcomes, offering a practical, scalable, and muchneeded solution for regulating civil online discourse in traditional educational and community institutions globally.
Furthermore, the study’s central empirical contribution is the strong positive correlation ($\rho = 0.72$)
established between Adherence to Digital Language Ethics and the Positive Engagement Level (used as a
quantitative proxy for Social Trust and Resilience). This robust finding quantitatively affirms a fundamental
Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

37
principle: ethical online behavior is a non-negotiable prerequisite for the successful accumulation of
social capital in the digital domain. This relationship reflects that institutionalized ethical digital governance,
exemplified by the observed HIEP model, yields tangible returns in community resilience, directly supporting the
overarching conference theme of Sustainability in the technological era. Prior research across various contexts
has consistently indicated that communication ethics, when measured, serves as a mechanism for enhancing
digital social capital (Darmayanti et al., 2023).
Delving deeper into the synthesis (RQ 5), the findings unequivocally confirm that this structure of digital selfgovernance, embodied by the Communal Digital Filtration Model, is the core driver of Community Resilience
and Institutional Sustainability. The compelling comparative evidence—Pesantren Y (High digitalization
profile with successful model implementation) reporting zero cases of internal digital conflict requiring
institutional intervention, versus Pesantren Z (Low profile with minimal self-governance practices) reporting 3
minor conflicts over the same period—provides strong evidence of the causal role of this self-governance
mechanism. The profound implication of this reflection is that the Communal Digital Filtration successfully converts
the inherent structural risk of high digital exposure (a modern threat) into measurable, protective Social Trust.
This mechanism functions as a powerful, culturally-integrated 'ethical gate' for information flow, effectively
safeguarding the institution’s sustainability from post-truth disruptions (Syafa et al., 2020; Bustomi et al., 2025).
The resounding success of this model offers a significant paradigm shift for administrators and policy makers: the
most resilient communities in the age of technology are not those that attempt to isolate themselves from digital
contact, but rather those that ethically self-regulate their internal digital interactions. This makes the
Communal Digital Filtration Model a demonstrably valid strategy for Sustainable Institutional Management
and the active promotion of ethical Humanity amidst the pervasive challenges of Industry 4.0, offering a tested
model for similar traditional institutions across the Asia Pacific region and beyond.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Conclusion
1. The Role of Indonesian Language in Media Literacy: Media literacy based on the use of standard and
ethical Indonesian serves as an effective social filter, helping reduce the negative impact of disinformation in
Pesantren environments and rural communities. This supports more credible communication and strengthens
social trust among the students.
2. Strengthening Social Trust: The internalization of linguistic ethics through digital media shows a positive
correlation with increased social trust. Students trained in media literacy tend to have better abilities in
assessing the credibility of information, which in turn enhances social cohesion and trust in institutional
authority.
3. Community Resilience: By applying language ethics-based media literacy, Pesantren communities become
more resilient in facing the challenges of the post-truth era and digitalization. This also contributes to
institutional sustainability by building human resources capable of adapting to technological and social
changes.
5.2 Recommendations
To enhance the effectiveness of media literacy in Pesantren environments and rural communities, it is
recommended that educational curricula include specific modules on language ethics and digital literacy. This
training should be designed to strengthen students' skills in using social media responsibly and ethically, while
improving their ability to filter accurate and trustworthy information. Therefore, Pesantren will not only function
as centers of religious education but also as social fortresses capable of maintaining trust and social cohesion
amidst the uncertain flow of information.

6. Reference
Ahlstrom-Vij, K. (2023). Do We Live in
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211026427

a

‘Post-Truth’

Era?

Political

Studies,

71(2).

Aminudin, A. (2022). Menghadapi Disinformasi Konten Berita Digital di Era Post Truth. JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA
Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

38
KOMUNIKASI, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v6i2.3137
Arnus, S. H., Husain, W., & Asriani, D. (2023). Online Media Literacy among Gen Z in Kendari City in the Post
Truth
Era.
KOMUNIKA:
Jurnal
Dakwah
Dan
Komunikasi ,
17(1).
https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v17i1.7806
Budgeon, S. (2021). Making feminist claims in the post-truth era: the authority of personal experience. Feminist
Theory, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988638
Bustomi, A. (2024). The Relationship Between Islamic Law and Positive Law of Indonesia and Recht Customs.
Jurnal Legisci, 2(1), 91–101.
Bustomi, A. A. (2016). Prospektif Pesantren sebagai lembaga Pendidikan dalam Konstruksi Multikultural
Masyarakat Indonesia. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 132–145.
Bustomi, A. A. (2019a). Kampus Santri: Alternatif Model Sinergi Akulturasi Pendidikan Tinggi Dan Pesantren.
Tarbawi: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islami, 7(2).
Bustomi, A. A. (2019b). Kampus Santri: Alternatif Model Sinergi Akulturasi Pendidikan Tinggi Dan Pesantren.
Tarbawi: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islami, 2.
Bustomi, A. A. (2020). Reaktivasi paradigma Islam wasathiyah masyarakat kampus melalui sinergi potensial
pendidikan tinggi &pesantren. AL-IFKAR, 14(2), 47–63.
Bustomi, A. A. (2024). Penerapan model komunikasi partisipatif dalam pengembangan program pendidikan anak
usia dini berbasis pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, 2(2), 121–138.
Ceyhan, G. D., & Saribas, D. (2022). Research trends on climate communication in the post-truth era. Educational
and Developmental Psychologist, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.2001295
Chair, B. M., & Adzfar, Z. (2021). Kebenaran di Era Post-Truth dan Dampaknya bagi Keilmuan Akidah. FIKRAH,
9(2). https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v9i2.12596
Davids, N. (2021). Academic freedom and the fallacy of a post-truth era. Educational Philosophy and Theory,
53(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1917363
Erturk Kilic, B. (2023). Program development for leaders in the post-truth era: Arts-based creative leadership
communication
program.
Evaluation
and
Program
Planning,
98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102295
Faturahmi, N. I. (2020). Peran lembaga informasi dalam era post-truth. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi,
16(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i2.101
Frederick, D. E. (2021). Scientific literacy, librarians and information literacy in the post-truth era. Library Hi Tech
News, 38(9). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2021-111
Hadijah Arnus, S., Husain, W., & Asriani, D. (2023). This is an open accessed articel under the CC-BY-SA license
at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Online Media Literacy among Gen Z in Kendari City in
the Post Truth Era. Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 17(1).
Hainscho, T. (2023). Calling the news fake: The underlying claims about truth in the post-truth era. Philosophy
and Social Criticism, 49(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211066854
Harambam, J., Grusauskaite, K., & de Wildt, L. (2022). Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on
conspiracy
theories
in
a
post-truth
era.
Public Understanding of Science, 31(6).
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221092145
Howat, A., Bruschke, J., & Ocampo, M. (2023). Critical thinking instruction for the post-truth era. Argumentation
and Advocacy, 59(1–4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2022.2125698
Huda, M. S., & Irama, Y. (2021). Resiliensi Muslim Moderat di Era Post Truth: Tipologi, Teori dan Praktik Di
Indonesia. El-Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.21093/el-buhuth.v3i2.3558
Ikhsan, M., . A., Fithriani, R., Habibi, A., Ridwan, M., Rusydi, I., A. Sipahutar, A., & Suhardi, B. (2021). Digital

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST

39
Literacy in the Post-Truth Era: Employing Fact-Checking Applications in Adult EFL Reading Classes. KnE
Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8704
Li, W. (2023). The Influence of Social Media Sentiment on Online Public Opinion in the Post-truth Era. Journal of
Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4395
Ljungblad, A. L. (2023). greta thunberg — a unique voice in a post-truth era. Childhood and Philosophy, 19.
https://doi.org/10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2023.69835
Moravcikova, E. (2020). Media Manipulation And Propaganda In The Post-Truth Era. MEDIA LITERACY AND
ACADEMIC RESEARCH, 3(2).
Nash, B. L. (2021). Constructing Meaning Online: Teaching Critical Reading in a Post-Truth Era. Reading Teacher,
74(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1980
Nasikhin, & Mahfud Junaedi. (2022). Strategies For Delivering Islamic Religious Education Learning Materials in
The Post-Truth Era. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam , 19(2).
https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v19i2.6354
Naskah, R., & Febrian Korompis, B. (2023). Reformasi dan Hermeneutika di Era Post Truth. Prosiding International
Reformation Conference, 1(1).
Pardede, J. N., & Poluakan, P. H. (2021). Law and Post-Truth: Critical Constructivism as an Ideal Legal Reasoning
Method on Indonesia’s Post-Truth Era Society. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4(1).
https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4202
Parker, L., & Smith, K. (2022). Literacy Education in the Post-Truth Era: The Pedagogical Potential of
Multiliteracies. Language and Literacy, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29577
Prasanti, D. (2020). Internalisasi Nilai Islam di era Post-truth: Instagram dr@zaidulakbar sebagai Media Literasi
Informasi Kesehatan. Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian. https://doi.org/10.31332/ai.v0i0.1790
Ruslan, R. (2022). Critical Information Literacy in the Post-Truth Era: A Strategy for Facing Information Flow in
Indonesia. Jurnal Adabiya, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/adabiya.v24i1.12325
Salganova, E. I., Bredikhin, S. S., & Shchetinina, E. V. (2023). Media and Information Literacy of Young Students
in
the
Post-Truth
Era.
Galactica
Media:
Journal
of
Media
Studies,
5(3).
https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v5i3.342
Saliu, H. (2022). PUBLIC DIPLOMACY OR PUBLIC GLOCALIZATION? RETHINKING PUBLIC DIPLOMACY IN THE
POST-TRUTH ERA. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika , 2022(1).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4147819
Sel, B. (2022). Social media use of prospective teachers in the post-truth era: Confirmation, trust, critical thinking
tendency. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.49.9.2
Toivanen, P., Nelimarkka, M., & Valaskivi, K. (2022). Remediation in the hybrid media environment:
Understanding
countermedia
in
context.
New
Media
and
Society,
24(9).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821992701
Visvizi, A., Jussila, J., Lytras, M. D., & Ijäs, M. (2020). Tweeting and mining OECD-related microcontent in the
post-truth
era:
A
cloud-based
app.
Computers
in
Human
Behavior,
107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.022
Xiu, L., Yang, Y., Han, T., & Yu, G. (2020). Emotional expression inhibits attention bias: From the post-truth era
perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8961

Enhancing SantriEducation: CombatingHoaxeswith MediaLiteracyat UniversitasNahdlatul
Ulama Pasuruan. ICHST. Vol 2(1). 29-38. 2025

ICHST