BUDGETING POLITICAL CAMPAIGN COST Study at some House of Representative candidates in Malang City
Authors
-
Erlin Iriani
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Gempol
Keywords:
budget, campaign, candidates, politic.Abstract
This study about the budgeting political campaign cost from some The House of Representatives candidates in Malang City. Every one who running to get some position as The House Of Representatives member must campaign to the voters about oneself, one’s vision, one’s mission and some programs that the one to work for. This research using the interview to the respondents and observe the field method. And collect some data from General Election Committee Malang City as well. All the respondents from The House of Representatives candidates that have been interviewed were not answers firmly the amount of money that they spending for their political campaign. They only tell the total spending money around some specific number, such as : up to 50 million, hundreds millions, or about 1 billion, etc. The House of Representatives candidates receive donate from political party in the form of goods, such as flag, shirt, brochures. And none of the donate are in the form of money. So the House of Representatives candidates must prepare some budget from their own money. All the political campaign cost must be report to the General Election Commission Malang City.
Downloads
References
1. Bousquet, J. (2021). Cabbage and fermented vegetables: From death rate
heterogeneity in countries to candidates for mitigation strategies of severe
COVID-19. Allergy European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 76(3),
735-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14549
2. Budiarti, E., Wahyuningsih, E. D., & Aulia, S. T. (2025). Pendidikan Agama
Islam Anak Usia Dini di Era Digital: Edisi Pertama. UNU PASURUAN PRESS.
3. Cost of Politics. (n.d.). The Cost of Politics Data Portal.
4. Cox, J. R. (2021). Anthropogenic Effects on the Contemporary Sediment
Budget of the Lower Rhine-Meuse Delta Channel Network. Earth S Future, 9(7).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001869
5. DPRD Kota Malang. (n.d.). Fraksi DPRD Kota Malang.
6. Evans, L. (2021a). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for
management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Medicine, 47(11),
1181-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
7. Evans, L. (2021b). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for
Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Critical Care Medicine, 49(11).
8. Friedlingstein, P. (2020). Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth System Science
Data, 12(4).
9. KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum). (2023). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum
Nomor 18 Tahun 2023 Tentang Dana Kampanye Pemilihan Umum.
10. Kramer, S. J. (2020). Phytoplankton Community Composition Determined From
Co-variability Among Phytoplankton Pigments From the NAAMES Field
Campaign. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00215
11. Kumorotomo, W. (2018). Kebijakan Publik dan Manajemen Sektor Publik.
12. Ma, X. (2022). OH and HO2 radical chemistry at a suburban site during the
EXPLORE-YRD campaign in 2018. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(14).
13. Owen, D. R. (2021). An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for
the treatment of COVID-19. Science, 374(6575).
https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4784
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Proceeding of the Excellent Campus and Technology Conference
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
